Search results

I bet they would have done better, partly because people would be annoyed at being forced out to vote and partly because the lazy chavs would vote for them in all probability.

Legally he was so there's no dispute. His sole intention was to try to create dismay (which apparently he didn't do) so he deserved what he got.

Lard Haw Haw was an out and out traitor, you could hardly accuse Nick Griffin of that.

You're just trying to keep people on their toes.

Exactly, it's up to the individual to decide who's right or wrong. Bearing in mind that World War Two is still in the minds of millions who were there or who's parents where does anybody really see the BNP as a threat to people's liberty ? Whether you are agree or disagree they have a right to...

Harsh, but true :lolol::lolol:

I'm sure if people watch Question Time with an open mind they should be able to decide whether or not the BNP have a valid point to make. It's a matter of personal choice and nobody needs to be told whether they are right or wrong. Anybody who's opinion is swayed by the appearance of Nick...

Is the correct answer. An appearance on Question time won't change many people's opinions but may reinforce a few.