Search results

its the same reply as previously given and doesnt answer anything. if the claim is that a falsk may be used to smuggle in a nefarious material/device, then so would a coke can, plastic water bottle, or wrapped up in a copy of "ISILToday" in the bottom of a bag for all the good the security...

it seems to me "different revenue models" is as equaly valid as any of the other reasons. as long as there is no explanation as to why a thermos flask is a risk, the perception will remain this is the reason.

but what actual risks are there? have cricket, tennis, bowling grounds similar bans?

if health and saftey were genuine they'd ban immediatly - not at the Fulham game. why where they safe yesturday and safe for Southampton. they'll be banning water bottles, food and bags next year. should have a protest Tuesday 28th, a mass flask carry.

club need to grow up on this and change their mind. health and safety risk should apply today and applied for years so thats cobblers. dont care if other clubs do it, we're better and fans want to take in a warm beverage. catering is at capacity so hardly likly to help with revenue, so just...

funny thing is, its nothing to do with the bottle lid, its the full bottle that the concern. half a kilo luzzed at someone would hurt.

now that makes more sense and why some clarification is needed.

ask the club/email Barber for clarification. people smuggling alcohol is not a safety reason so sounds like possible duff information. and if it has happened ban those people, dont ban flasks ffs.