Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. beorhthelm

    [Football] Why bring on Dier?

    ... until about 70th min when they started to actually play football, some 10 min before Dier came on. was i the only one that noticed this?
  2. beorhthelm

    [Football] Why bring on Dier?

    disagree because they'd been more into the game for about 10 min when that change was made. i sort of agree a more like for like forward player would have been better, but Dier coming on did not change the flow of the game at that point, which had already occured.
  3. beorhthelm

    [Football] Why bring on Dier?

    cant believe that, he plays well for them. and for england after 120min.
  4. beorhthelm

    [Football] Why bring on Dier?

    :lolol: :jester:
  5. beorhthelm

    [Football] Why bring on Dier?

    Dier for Alli was ok substituion at the time. shore up the defense, Henderson can push forward to support attacks. Vardy was the error, like the player but wants a ball over the top and doesnt make runs to offer the option. Rashford or Loftus-Cheek for the physical presense and pressing...
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here