Search results

i did say, twice, we should follow the law. cant really see how thats disingenuous. do you think we should ban online campaigning to avoid this type of targeted electioneering?

no need to be so defensive, just picking up from the conclusion you made. and in answer my response is still the same - what does the law say, and how much weight do we want to give to this overspend. its a conundrum.

that depends on what remedy those regulations provide in the event they are broken. pretty sure the default isnt "re-run the election". rules are often broken or badly bent regarding postal votes and voter registration, not enough evidence, not enough impact means we dont rerun those...

i do like some dramatic music to punctuate a message. not going to defend actions that may have skirted around rules, but just remember the remain side spent 50% more than leave side, and thats not including a mailshot to every house funded by government (not counted in the official Vote remain...

so, you are suggesting a referendum on EU membership every 4-5 years? lets do that. re-run the referendum and then every few years have a vote to maintain the membership and/or approval and new treaties of the EU. meanwhile let go back a step to the point raised - what was not considered...

you think this is new? its really an refinement of the marketing methods used for decades. and it was Obama's teams use of deep data mining that showed the value of these techniques. the reason this particular firm is become so well known was due to its links to Bannon and the Trump campaign...