Search results

thats not whats happening here, according to the BMA there just changes to the pay structure for weekends/nights, because they say doctors already cover all periods sufficiently. or are they fibbing and more doctors will have to cover the weekends, in which case isnt that to the improvment of...

absolutely, people will draw conclusions of health services on comparison of a single metric when there are dozens of them. we score relatively poorly on clinical outcomes for some conditions, but very high on detection of the same - so is the fact we detect and treat an ultimately terminal...

no support for the changes, hence "absolutely" in agreement with your point.

this is my problem, clearly this piece is trying to steer an opinion but is being dishonest. none of the example rotas have above 45 hours average, though some weeks as much as 66 hours. but the article contradicts itself, noting some are already are contracted 56 hours. so how changes to 56...

absolutly, so there is clearly no support. however there is clearly deliberate attempts to portray the change as universaly bad, for doctor and by implication for us. the rotas are being communicated (by Happypig's source) as if thats the future, on one response i saw as if its the current...

i would suggest there is some dis-information on both sides. the source is the nhsemployer, one of 15 example rotas

yes, but then we only have the governments numbers for reference. something i read was that there will be for some years top up payments for doctors that dont meet the 11% in normal hours, to ensure the commitment is kept.

i was going to ask how that compares to now, but apparently that is a current rota pattern

in year one. 28k year two, and so on until about 70k after 9 years as a consultant.

i dont understand this dispute. its normal for there to be large gap on each side in industrial dispute, but some of the claims directly contradict each other and you wouldnt expect educated doctors to just follow the union line. its a high turn out with high vote for clearly they arent...