Search results

which is a nonsence example as this was done to shore up the economy and protect everyone from Mrs Brown the pensioner to Mr Brooks the company director. social support isnt being taken away from regular people, who are those in regular full time work and not in receipt of social support.

how is it possible to seem to understand the socialism/capitialism symbiosis (capitialism pays for socialism, which guides capitialism), then abruptly turn about to such a ridiculous conclusion. as if you cant bring yourself to acknowledge the reality. its patently absurd to say we have...

yes, based on the rise of industry and transformation of countries out of agrarian servitude and absolute poverty, since latter half of 18th century.