Search results

how can you say that outright, when out the first four columns (making up the majority of total), only one (opening door) attributes blame directly to the motorist?

So cyclist have to be encouraged to user safer roads and routes... and im the one that needs speaking to slowly? the article didnt exactly stress the purpose as youhave put, it just seems mindnumbingly obvious to take a safer back street route in the first place, and such routes dont need...

the suggestion is for "ban on overtaking on lightly trafficked roads where cycle flows are high"... i.e. back streets. so what exactly is the point of this? no one is dying in light traffic are they? i wonder if they also might consider a law, other than Darwin's, to discourage cyclist...