Search results

and there's the problem. you cant "buy out" patents to supress them, once they are filed and granted they are public record. its the whole point of the patent process, to say "i invented this first" if someone else comes along and does the same idea (even if independently). Meyers is a...

not true. the peer review is only a sanity check that the method is sound, the conclusions follow, etc. there's no requirement to repeat the experiment and some dodgy claims have slipped through over the years. rather the piont in climate science, there isnt too much actual experimentation...

but i paid attention at school and all the scientist say this stuff guff. its a modern version of alchemy, replace lead and gold for water and fuel. you find people have been making the claims for decades, yet the method never comes to widespread public knowledge somehow (or its Browns gas and...

oh dear, "aligning atoms"... come back when there's an indepedently verified operation.

firstly, no you cant combust water. its a highly stable compound thats already oxidised. you have to first split the water into hydrogen and oxygen, so that you can combust back into water. that spliting takes energy, im no chemist/physicist but understand this process takes more energy than...

you know that is the normal process of the scientific method? an observation disproves the theory, you have to propose a new theory to cover the new observation. that seems to be the core problem for climate change, its not really a firm theory, its become a bit of a moving target or at least...

agree, but i fear the problem is no debate is allowed. if you want to question any of it you are a "denier" and must be burnt at the stake. reducing carbon emissions, by say using more efficient power plants or cleaner fuel, isnt good enough and we've theres a mentality saying "no carbon at...

this is a very valid but somewhat different matter. one of the things that falls out of the climate science is to use renewables, but nothing much is said about the viability of those renewables. for example, you wouldnt want to replace all the cars in the world with electric ones because the...

is there another sort then? the point i make isnt limited to climate science, its a general issue with any science thats heavily dependant on models rather than actual hard, empirical experimentation. I've read papers that have that sort of margin of error, which is as good as put a finger in...

nope. too much of it isn't hard science, its computer simulations and models based on limited observations and the researchers prejudices. some models that fed into the IPCC report didnt even include Sun radiation output. it is immensley complex, and some of the inputs and feedback cycles...