Search results

no one is refering to MSM here (except, ironically yourself when it suits), just spotting the garguntuan holes in your version of events. why dont you attempt to answer the point, why are "they" so poor at putting on these events, instead of throwing up misdirection about MSM?

the most intriguing thing is the idea that, in amidsts the carnage and chaos of a bomb going off, "they" would plant a person and associates would fake leg injuries, just in case there were no real injuries. could they just make a bigger explosion? maybe im wrong, the pictures do raise...

:lolol: well yes it rather is. you are repeating yourself, you posted that on Sunday, and as then it was easy to refute this as simply someone deliberatly ignoring the time line of events and from that misleading you to think that the wrong library was refered to. the fact that the tweet time...

oh, like you. picking up whatever little bone you have read on abovetopsecret or the like, then regurgitating without question. picking up glints of a hidden story, then missing the other information? for example: no, one of them was interviewed 3 years ago and th FBI decided there was...

why is this key? it shows someone can use google maps while in possession of a rather poor taste of 80's TV film score music (seriously is there a CD for these guys to get this stuff on?). it also shows someone is incapable of telling the difference between two seperate widely reported events...

very much so. common trait with every CT is a trail of evidence which is used to prove the CT, because it "raises questions". all the planning by some of the most secretive groups in the world, and they'll leave an obvious clue it was them. it starts to then get silly as CT'ers explain this...

yeah, thats exactly what i'd do if i were a government agency planning a bombing, have identifiable units around being seen and filmed. alongside the known paraplegic veteran with fake injuries, noone is going to spot them. its not like there are hundreds of crackpots out there trawling over...

right so there was no shot outs then, the media lied. i look forward to all the witnesses coming forward to tell how they didnt hear any gun fire or police and nothing happened that night. is it strange to rob a shop when on the run? well i do think so, but then im not a nutter. are you...

where are the claims they were running around with an arsenal in the city centre? as far as i heard, they were in the city centre dropping off thier ruck sacks (which is witnessed, hence after a day or so the leads emerged), then had a shoot out in the suburbs, which was on film wasn't it? oh...

er, yes, yes it would be appropriate. what do you suggest? let the man hijack another car or two, have another shoot out in the street, maybe let him get out of town. i suppose that makes it someone elses problem. let him get to the state line then smash in his headlight, that'll learn him.

here's the thing: theres a world outside the US. Iranian earthquake, North Korea, Gold crashing, Obama gun law dieing on its arse, Thatchers funeral, Brighton above Palace, and you still think they have to create a distraction. nobody outside a few sites frequented by paranoid americans gives...

you know, one of the most basic premises of a "false flag" is that there is reduced security.

the problem is there are so many threats (at least in London, dont know about Boston) that you'd close up shop to be safe. sensible policy is to take suitable measures. sadly sometimes they arent enough - as they used to say they only have to get it right once - but the alternative is giving in.

that would only be "odd" if sniffer dogs were not routinely at such events, do we know that they aren't? also it is not the standard practice to given in and cancel events to every threat, its kinda surrender to them remember? no doubt this is a false flag to distract from other events, like...