Christ you're hard work, what part of " I have a problem with their stance of wanting to be fair to ISIS , and tying themselves up in knots about using pejorative terms" are you struggling with ? It's their STANCE I have a problem with, I don't care if they call them Andy pandys Islamic militia...
i have a problem with their stance of wanting to "be fair" to ISIS and tying themselves up in knots about not using "pejorative " terms , but you knew that really, or if you didn't, you haven't read the article or my posts properly, or you're not nearly as bright as you'd like to think.
Don't even know what they are, they sound as if they're something similar to stormfront or one of the other far right mouthpieces, the trouble is you and people like you refuse to distinguish between people with concerns and grievances and the far right nutters who'd have us all goose stepping...
It is reporting the facts , but i'd prefer an organisation that im forced to fvcking pay for to have a default position of being pro british( the clue is in the fvcking name ) and not so worried about ''being fair'' to our enemies, thanks.
ISIS is an organisation that wants to destroy our way of life, it is at war with us, it has just killed 38 people in cold blood in Tunisia, would you have wanted them to remain impartial about the nazis ?
They must remain impartial and ''fair'' to ISIS.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/the-bbc-must-be-fair-to-isis-head-of-broadcaster-rejects-calls-to-stop-using-term-islamic-state-10359806.html