Search results

I love this idea. Unfortunately, I think they wear it simply because they have shedloads in the warehouse...

So you're saying clubs have to wear an away kit unless there's a clash? In which case, why didn't West Ham change to all-black last week? (Edit: I bet Man Utd will wear red at the Amex too...)

Possibility, I guess. But I find this hard to believe given that a) we're wearing it for EVERY away league game (not simply a 'bit' more than usual), and b) I haven't noticed any other club doing the same. It's more telling, I think, that the "alternative kit" is still readily available in all...

Whatever the reason, it's nothing to do with colour clash. Other teams change socks. We change the entire kit. And, yes, we do have blue socks available... Anyway...

Yes, yes, but we can’t be THAT desperate to flog shirts which will still be around next season, surely? Madness. UNLESS someone REALLY over-ordered I guess? Hmmmm...

Agreed. Stoke wore red/white at the Amex. It’s Albion who keep changing unnecessarily.

I don’t mind the design, personally, BUT the team keeps wearing it when it’s not necessary. A change of socks to blue would have done today, for example. Annoying thing is: Millions of TV viewers around the world will have seen Albion for the first time this season. Surely we want the blue and...