Search results

Swansea sat back with 11 men, CC really admitted as much and got lucky in scoring first. Until then Swansea had only attacked once in 40 minutes when (the awful on the night) Gomez dived in at RB. With that sort of match, 21 men condensed at one end of the pitch, the result was almost...

Scoring first means so much in football. Can then mass defend and counter at will.

Ings on. Gomez has had a poor game. Sold himself for Swansea's only attack of the first 40 minutes and awful passing. Looks like a classic PL home mugging.

Swansea taking 30 seconds on each dead play. 11 men behind the ball. How the hell do teams break that down? Pulis teams had many a famous win using that game plan.

This. Same with Arsenal.

Swansea haven't taken then game to Liverpool. They've sat back, were poor for 40 minutes, but sucker punched. Albion's taking the game to Liverpool and Chelsea, got its just desserts. Have to be more circumspect, unfortunately.

Albion - do you think they'll stay up or drop?

True. Laughable that a 0-4 was so encouraging.

Albion down for you?

Swansea didn't. The Sky team were critical of their offensive play, until the goal.

That's it. Time wasting will not will kill 50 minutes.

What a boring game of football. Home team going for a 0-0, taking an age on goal kicks etc. No wonder CC bored the Massive fans to death. At half time the Sky team will have collective boners about the Swansea shape. Which is effectively a 10 man defence, out of the Pulis school of anti...

I’m the opposite, always hated the arrogant London clubs and mouthy cockney’s. Not just football, nice not to hear them on holiday. But I do get it why so many people hate ManUre, Maureenho, etc.

Affection for Arsenal or Chelski?

Liverpool have been exceptional for months. Even the defence has been sound. But in the PL away from home, who knows what will happen. Shown by Spurs who were poor yesterday. Easy to see a 3-0 Liverpool or a 2-1 Swansea.