The banding should be based on function though .... or at least good banding. So a managerial role would have a managerial banding - not linked at all to the techies roles. I used to manage a team of third line network engineers - all earning £80k+ while I was on £55k - didn't bother me, they...
Utter rubbish - it's the ROLE that is placed at a grading not the person fulfilling the role. So for example let's take an IT Technician Grade 1. The Salary is likely to be £24k - £30k. A departmental manager would have a set number of IT technician Grade 1 roles - it matters not what gender...
Hopefully I'm not too late with my advice. As others have said, ignore salary for now but also make sure you have some probing questions t ask ( download the accounts from Companies House is always a good idea - then you can ask about loses etc ). But there is a killer question to use but make...
I kind of agree with this method but not to the point of publishing an employees exact salary. I prefer the way corporates do it in that every role has a banding / grade and each banding / grade has a salary range and these are published rather than the individual employees salary. Each...