Search results

You seem to have missed the NSC poll that gave UKIP 30% - a lead over the Greens who were the next party of 10%. You can scoff as usual but even on here UKIP has significant support.

As well you know it's used as an insult. Your argument about solar power may well be correct but of course you couldn't help but throw in the phrase to highlight your hatred of UKIP.

An argument somewhat loses it's potency when the poster uses this pathetic phrase.

I accept polls are wrong sometimes but the latest ones show Labour on around 37, Tories around 35, UKIP around 15% and Lib Dems under 10%. It will be interesting if that is the result in 2015 as to what horse trading is carried out to form a government.

Nope -

182k extra incoming in 2013

The "extra" in 2012 was 176k - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23878689

I agree with you that the MAIN cause of the housing problem is successive governments inability to actually build any new homes. That said you can't discount immigrants also increasing the need for housing. Where are these extra 120k people a year meant to live ? Also interested in your use of...

I'm not convinced you're correct with that last bit. While I agree Farage was a bit clumsy in that "interview" it wouldn't change my mind. More so, the more I see UKIP attacked the more I'm willing I am to consider voting for them. I believe in CONTROLLED immigration ( Oz style ) yet I've been...

I'm not going to buy the rag just to read some made story. Your post doesn't indicate it was a tweet nor does it say who tweeted it. Yet you posted it with your usual anti-UKIP glee. Given you've not managed to post an equally gleeful post about the new "explosive" details would suggest there...

And it said what ?

They could kill UKIP overnight by all agreeing a referendum on the EU this parliament.

So where was this explosive extra stuff today you promised ?

Surely that assumes the accusations are correct ? No innocent until proven guilty for Farage then ?

I suggest you wait until May before really judging. I suspect you might be posting a little less then.

Simster and myself aren't likely to ever agree politically but the point is that you seem to use different standards to measure the parties you hate to those that you favour. You'll see no wrong in say the left but no good at all in the right. Both have their faults and positives. A good example...

a) Of course he won't. Politicians of all parties have been accused of expenses fiddles. Some have been found guilty - others not. None have sued the papers. I know that doesn't suit your hatred of UKIP. b) And the Tories have members who have made fun of disabled people, Labour have members...

I see your obsession is still ongoing. a) The Times - a Tory supporting paper and UKIP are eating into who's support mainly ? Hmm ..... b) Please detail which UKIP policies are racist ?

I hate to point it out but what makes a question obvious is the question mark - I can't see one in your post.

Sorry, I didn't realise that forcing a change of government via financial means rather than voting methods was better than changing it via military means.