it's not obvious at all, they still relied on us for a lot of supplies , ever heard of the Russian convoys ? And it's not like we didn't have a war machine ourselves, the soviet army of the time, and subsequently through to the present day to be fair , has always been primitive and lacking in...
Actually yes , you are the thick one out of the two of us, by some distance actually, you 'couldn't believe anyone would think like that ' well perhaps you should do some research, you should also learn a little bit about our 'allies' the Russians as well , stuff like the von Ribbentrop pact and...
If you genuinely can't grasp my point (and I'm highly sceptical) then your lack of perception is remarkable, are you really that thick ? So for your benefit, you said that there was little that Britain or America could do to force Stalin and the rest of the soviet government to take their...
You know EXACTLY what point I am making , you've just repeated it when talking about nuking Eastern Europe, as for your comments about armed men being angry with little Britain , you're either deliberately obtuse or just thick to be honest.
Don't get all bitter and twisted because you somehow failed to see what was a very clear point, what I'm saying is that the threat may well have been enough, it stopped the soviets from invading the west for 50 odd years and they were in possession of the self same weapons for most of that time...
Neither was I, it's not difficult , you stated there was ' very little America or our little battered Island' could do about Stalin at the end of the war, I said that the residents of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may disagree with that premise, the clue is in the fvcking bombs that America posessed...