Search results

And you think ours was "dodgy" because it's 3 degrees off "bird's eye view"? Each to their own, I guess..

you can't see all of the ball over all of the line? interesting.

That's the one.

It wasn't dodgy. They had a a camera angle nearly perfectly in line with the goal line, showing it was out.

Unless its us at home. They had to go back a long way to find a marginal decision to rule out our third against Arsenal last season. Then there was MacAllister's thunderbastard then there was....... ad infinitum.

Yes

This. Dyche was happy to call out the penalty appeals for his side, but didn't mention the ludicrous decision to rule out Dunk's equaliser.

Yes but that's only because there is no reason to make mistakes now the laws permit a second check within the game. It was always established that human error was a factor, before VAR.

Redefined, not binned. Same with Penalty decisions. The Technology was bought in to help precisely these decisions and is having the opposite effect. Way too many penalties given, leading to increased appeals and dives. Way too many goals being ruled out for dubious offsides.

From that angle - definitely in play. It's well established that the camera angle hs a massive impact on how the 2D still looks

The laws of the game need a serious rethink in light of VAR. It has changed the game in many more ways than were considered from the outset. Unnecessary delays to the game ruling out goals which would not have been challenged, before the technology existed Changing the way defenders have to...