Search results

If this game had been identical, but with Attwell and Salisbury of last season, Spurs would have won 4-1. Estupinan's goal would have stood, no penalties would have been given (to us), and Jack's opener would have been ruled out for some made up foul before it got to him. Jokers.

That's what the officials owe us. We scored these ones fair and square, so they still owe us 4.

They owe us about 4 goals from that game. So if Spurs outplay us and it should be 3-0 to them, then it really should be 4-3 to us for a semblance of justice

If he genuinely thought he wasn't good enough for Chelsea, then the salary for him makes sense. If he thinks he's good enough, he's mad.

260k a month = £60k a week. Seems a bit daft for a player to accept such a low salary for a club as rich as Chelsea, for 8 years. With inflation he'll be on very little in a few years. That might even be below the average PL wage for people 22 and above

The problem is, they don't mean anything if we can't get results ourselves, which we currently can't do.

I know they f***ed up, but I don't have them down as naive. They're usually quite whiley

Entertaining match, that'll do me