No, it's not down to limited over games, it's down to you picking out some of our greatest ever players (not all from the same team, but spread across decades), and expecting our whole team to perform as well. That's just silly.
Just compare our team with the opposition. In One Day cricket...
I don't use the ignore function for anyone. If someone spouts nonsense, I prefer to see their crap challenged. I am chilled, I just choose to disagree with posts that I think are bullsh*t.
Nope. See above.
What do you mean? If we don't remove either of them, then obviously we can't win. If one stays in but we bowl the rest out cheaply (basically like the first innings), then we'll be in with a chance.
:lolol:
That's really not the case. Anyone predicting the scores is guessing, and they know they're guessing, but those guesses are within the realms of possibility. Some however, as you say, are totally absurd with no logic.
You can see us getting 480, and then Australia getting 350? I don't think our lead will be anything like that, and I certainly hope the cheats don't get 350.
He can be compared with the best in the world. He's currently the 7th best, according to the ICC rankings.
Firstly, the point you were making was that he's can't be compared to the top batsmen in the world (he can). Secondly, we're not currently up against it, so today isn't the day we needed...