Search results

This. Then pick which version of 'doesn't get her plan through'.

The last paragraph is ridiculous, and I disagree with the rest.

If we don't leave, and don't have another referendum, democracy will have failed. If we have another referendum, with the options A) Stay in B) Leave with a crap deal that no one wants, then again Leavers will understandably feel betrayed. If there is a better worded second referendum, and...

Which is odd, given that I'm a leaver.

Er, shouldn't you have voted "May doesn’t get plan through, she gets new deal with EU, result unknown"

Yes, but as I said, it wasn't fishermen on the 10m boat that were throwing things, it was fishermen on a French 30m boat. Anyway, enough distraction from Brexit already.

I don't think the Honeybourne changed its course to ram the French boat, it looks like the French boat cut across the Honeybourne. The footage was taken from another French ship, and they haven't released all the footage. And the people throwing things weren't on the 10m boat, they were on...

In my experience, throwing metal parts and rocks is regarded by all sides as going beyond what is considered an acceptable protest.

I don't think it works like that.

Firstly it seems daft that there was an agreement with no legal standing. Is really that 'the British' as a whole broke the agreement, and that 'the British' aren't concerned with protecting stocks, or was it a small number of large boats that broke the agreement?

Yeah that's how I remember it too. The French fisherman should have been on at the French fisheries dept at the start, to make sure they weren't restricted while the British were allowed to continue. Instead of banning the French fishermen, the French fisheries should then have been working with...

Protesting? Obviously they weren't just protesting, which is the point. If the rules aren't protecting the fishermen, because they're allowing wealthy companies to over-fish, change the rules.

Yes, that's what the EU want. No chance the UK would accept that.

We? Isn't there a department within the EU that would hear the French complaints and make the rules for the fishing? There were rules, and the British boats were fishing within them when they were attacked.

Who is letting the facts get in the way? Certainly not me. So a British boat broke the rules twice, and got fined each time. That doesn't suddenly make it lawful for the French fisherman to attach the British boats.

Er, that's innocent, since fishing then is within the law. The French fisherman broke the law by damaging the British boats. They didn't object, they broke the law. You seem to be putting spin on this. Presumably our fishing methods are the same as they've been for years - if it's causing a...

Too short? I'm sure she'd lie down for you.

What happened to Sarah Harding? Fair enough.

Thank you :)

Have you had a bad day?