Search results

If we were in Assad's position, we'd want an end to the violence and we'd do our best to protect civilians. Whatever you think of Assad, you don't think he's a good guy do you? If Assad cares what the UN thinks, I haven't noticed.

Yes I can see the logic, and I certainly don't know for sure who carried out the attack. But we can't be certain either he or his opposition would use them again.

The problem is, the moral high ground is worth **** all anyway. If our country were saintly for the next 30 years, our words still wouldn't carry any more weight - countries like China and Russia couldn't give a **** if we've done nothing wrong for 30 years, they just want what's best for...

I misunderstood your post. I thought you were saying that "if Syria did use chemical weapons, then them using those chemical weapons was proportional". I realise now that you meant the US actions were proportional IF Syria used them, which is fair enough. That is the hope, but we can't be...

That's an unusual viewpoint. How is the mass murder of civilian men, women and children, using chemical weapons, proportional? No we can't. You have a such a blinkered view it's unbelievable.

Team Trump. EDIT - I see you've already discussed this with others, so I'll leave it except to suggest that air bases are pretty big, and it might not have been extreme.