Search results

There's no logic in that.

They won't bowl 40 overs though will they? That doesn't make sense. It's as old as the number of balls bowled, it would be older if they'd bowled at a faster rate. Which would also have happened if they'd bowled at a faster rate.

Why would they be better off if they had bowled at a quicker rate?

You think.

Well this is a bit shit.

Even if they're a cheat?