Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. Triggaaar

    Brighton sign Harper

    Also perhaps before we found we'd be playing 442. If we were playing 451 (or 4411, 4231 etc), maybe we'd see him earlier.
  2. Triggaaar

    Brighton sign Harper

    Well I'd guess that the latter was true - he was never going to get in RM's first team, whereas he should get in ours at some point, but that's not the promise of playing him any time soon. He has signed as a development squad player, he's not been given a number in our main squad has he. Do you...
  3. Triggaaar

    Brighton sign Harper

    Or a midfielder of any sort. Sorry, have I got the wrong player here? I thought he was a forward. 433 doesn't have a front 2, it has a front 1, with a couple of wide forwards, like Elvis, Baldock, March. I can't see us playing 4312.
  4. Triggaaar

    Brighton sign Harper

    So, on the bench ahead of the likes of Zamora and Elvis? If we've got injuries, then he could be on the bench, but I still wouldn't expect him to play unless we've got a couple of strikers out. Surely he's a prospect for the future, not a first team option this season?
  5. Triggaaar

    Brighton sign Harper

    I'm not expecting to see him at all. What's the highest level he's ever played at, and whom would he be replacing?
  6. Triggaaar

    Brighton sign Harper

    You think our strike force is ready?
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here