Search results

Lots of things in a building could explode if on fire, or heated up. The plane didn't hit the grass. The wings came off. Who says the hole is the size of a missile? I'm sure missiles are generally a lot smaller, unless you're taking out the whole city. Because they don't feel the need to. If...

No, it's because it's the most sensible explanation. Just because people believe something is true, doesn't mean they never questioned it. It's clear that people in this thread looked into the 9/11 conspiracy theories more than you did, and after doing so, came to the conclusion that they were...

Obviously the entire world hasn't, because the vast majority of people believe it was a terrorist attack. You think you know better, but you're not even willing to share what you believe is the truth, which is very weird for someone that believes it was an inside job.

Oh I've seen them, and they're as crazy as the next one. But you say you've discovered that it was an inside job - complete fact, rather than standard internet BS. Although I suspect it's just the latter.

Care to share with us how you discovered that it was an inside job?

He said "we've reached a point in history where we don't need everyone to work hard anymore", and I'm simply saying that we still need plenty of people to work hard, and they won't do so unless they're paid more than others. No one said otherwise. Mustafa said it was a broken system and we need...

Fine, if we get to the point where we don't need doctors, great. But we need them now, so we still need the system that rewards those that work hard. There's a lot of gold for doctors. And there's also great profits for those who can come up with new, useful technology. Given how I despise...

I totally disagree, for many reasons. We'll always need doctors, and you don't learn the skills required to be a doctor by working the same as everyone else, you have to work harder, and people won't do that unless they're going to be paid more. And we still need to beat diseases, and to develop...

What good would it do for him to give up everything before the revolution? I thought the article by the banker (if not by a PR team) was good, and I don't think the bankers themselves are the right target, but I don't see the problem with him speaking against a system he disagrees with.

To extend the quote: Brand was asked by Lucy Kellaway on his anti-capitalist and anti-establishment views and his whether or not he would be giving up his Hollywood lifestyle, to which Brand replied: “It probably does mean that, yes.” “I’d give up everything," he added. "I’ve thought about...

But he doesn't want to lead. He wants to complain about what he sees as injustice, he hopes others will complain too, and that a leader will emerge. He should be allowed to complain and encourage revolt without having to be the leader.