Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. Triggaaar

    Surely a decision should of been reached by now on Gus!

    The OP is saying we should have got rid already. I'm saying that there's a £5m problem with doing it quickly (not getting the £2.5m another club could pay us to take him + buying Gus out of his contract for £2.5m ). You ask why we'd have to pay him the money should it happen that he's in breach...
  2. Triggaaar

    Surely a decision should of been reached by now on Gus!

    1) We'd lose the £2.5m that another club would have to pay us. 2) There's no guarantee he could be dismissed for gross misconduct, without having to pay his contract - and if we rush it, as you suggest, we're more likely to have to pay him (about £2.5m).
  3. Triggaaar

    Surely a decision should of been reached by now on Gus!

    No it shouldn't. Has another club approached us, are they willing to pay the compensation fee, or do you think we should pay Gus off, for a loss of £5m (which will come out of our playing budget)?
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here