Search results

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

  1. Triggaaar

    Ipswich losses for 2012 £16m, £79m in debt.....

    So? They don't all need to have benefit to make the argument that it shouldn't be used to benefit the club a valid one. The fact that a club like Leicester can spend £60m on a new ground, and then write off the debt via administration and carry on, is just crazy.
  2. Triggaaar

    Ipswich losses for 2012 £16m, £79m in debt.....

    Shouldn't something be done to stop clubs benefiting from administration?
  3. Triggaaar

    Ipswich losses for 2012 £16m, £79m in debt.....

    Lost a few £m 2010-11, expected to be around £2-3m loss for 2011-12. Not as bad as most. Well, er yes, but...
  4. Triggaaar

    Ipswich losses for 2012 £16m, £79m in debt.....

    Palace aren't breaking the rules are they? They're doing quite well from an FFP point of view.
  5. Triggaaar

    Ipswich losses for 2012 £16m, £79m in debt.....

    Oh ok. I don't know the details of how the FA get involved, how do they profit from teams going into administration with little punishment? A company can have as much debt as it likes - until a creditor asks for the money back, they can carry on.
  6. Triggaaar

    Ipswich losses for 2012 £16m, £79m in debt.....

    We know it's wrong, shouldn't we do something about it? Can't fans put pressure on the FA to treat clubs wiping out debts with measures more in line with their crime?
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top