Search results

There seems to be a body of opinion here who would happily have suppressed a true story that cut to the very heart of how the club was being run because of a play-off push. You wouldn't expect me to agree with that, and I don't. Words like shit-stirring, being disloyal, negative, destabilising...

Actually, it wasn't me. It was El Pres initially (before this article appeared). But having read it, it looks as if much of the information has been known for a while.

Let's hope we never get to the stage where the Argus feel they have to have the club's 'blessing' before they publish a story!

El Presidente said on another thread there were people who knew all this weeks ago, he mentioned Naylor by name and also 'In The Know' types on NSC, and suggested that not upsetting the play-off campaign was the reason. Now what fans know and choose/choose not to publish is totally up to them...

It seems to me that article could have been written weeks ago. So my question is...why wasn't it? I don't expect to read it in the club programme, but I do expect to read it in the Argus if they knew. Are the Argus now so 'in' with the club that they dare not stand up to a sharp call from...

Have to say, that 'he's not interested' view has the smell of some club spin put about to deflect any blame coming the way of senior management...