Like somebody said as a comment on the Argus website - not normally known for its sane take on things - 'we've lasted the last 100 years without a Technical Director. Another 6 months won't make much difference' :lolol:
For sure. But if it came to the crunch (which it will) would the club back CH or the TD? And how many decent managers would tbe club get through before it decided to ditch the TD (which it will)
CH might give all the right responses about being happy with it now. But no manager worth their salt will be happy with the introduction of an interfering somewhat superfluous person introduced into the heirarchy above him. IMHO it's a wrong move by a club still trying to find their way in the...
Would have thought that introducing a high-profile Technical Director can't be anything other than a recipe for intoducing friction and bitchin' into the existing club heirarchy. Possibly a good thing. But probably not.