Or is it because one of the victims of SpyCops has been used by Lush without her permission?
https://twitter.com/Patrick66013298/status/1003390766767595520
1003390766767595520
https://twitter.com/Patrick66013298/status/1003392480669249538
1003392480669249538...
It might be advertising but I've seen many tweets and Facebook posts, from females who are now going to boycott them. There are female police, and police wives who are objecting strongly.
It could be a Ratner moment.
There were a few undercover cops who had relationships with women, got some pregnant, whilst investigating activists. I don't agree with the way the undercover cops went about their work, but this campaign is very ill thought out, and distressing to police, and their families.
Not all stores...