Search results

It isn't even the Argus, it's the B&H Independant, so if we're making assumptions, I actually reckon the sentence is not to go within 5 miles of an away ground when Brighton are playing (which would make a lot more sense) rather than any old football ground. I agree it's been badly reported.

The poor hard done by fellow. He can't go to a football match for three years. Some people would think that's a blessing. Funnily enough, the ones moaning about it, don't go to our matches any more.

Now you're just being silly.

Exactly.

That's down to politicians making laws just for football and a legacy of Hillsborough and other incidents.

Hearsay is someone else saying the bloke was around trouble in the past ie a third party. That isn't admissable in court. The police are saying he was around trouble in the past, although not actually convicted of any offence. There is a difference. For instance, I could say I saw drew near...

The examples I gave were harsher ie, life bans not three year bans.

Good use of the word probably.

Banned for life for throwing a plastic glass at the referee.Rugby League http://www.seriousaboutrl.com/salford-supporter-ban-8075/ Banned for life for abusing Lomo (and from Nottm Forest ground also for other offences)Rugby Union...

No previous convictions doesn't mean he wasn't arrested, just that there wasn't enough evidence to convict him.

For it to have been used, meant that his name or identity had been previously noted, but not enough evidence to charge or convict him. Now it seems they did have, and used it. There are at least two charges here, assault and possession of a class A drug.