Search results

So you believe that Bristow should be able to air his views in public and those he is condemning as wimps should just ignore his tweets.

Because Bristow is an ex-sportsman and thus a minor celeb he has a greater reach in who his tweets connect with and thus his views are more likely to spread a lot quicker than any you or I would send. A prime example of not thinking before you air you views in cyber space.

Because there is a huge difference between some non-entity troll in a bedsit in Kettering with half a dozen followers and a sportsman who has some national media presence. The latter has a far greater reach than the former and thus needs to be a bit more responsible in what they say. You appear...

Which other celebs have been saying the same as Bristow?

What about the four men he was commenting on? Should they accept putting his thoughts in the public domain?

But what about the people he was tweeting about? By putting it in the public domain there is a chance they will pick up on it, unless of course you are quite happy for someone to publically call you a wimp because you didn't act a certain way when you were 13.

One of the footballers abused by Barry Bennell found Bristow's tweet offensive. Should he put up with it because it is a different view?