Search results

Ok. Yes you can say things, you can have any opinion on any subject. I could say that, for example Everton were the best team in the Premier League last season. That’s an opinion someone might have. But does that make it a credible claim? I wouldn’t say so, because there is significant evidence...

To clarify, I did state it previously but yes, of course everyone is entitled to an opinion. However, it is my personal belief that in order to give any argument credibility, you have to justify it with evidence. If you disagree with that fair enough, not sure there is anything I can say to you...

As I alluded to, this is going beyond just being a little clueless but well meaning. You are irritating me with your arrogance, and you are not addressing any of the evidence I am presenting to you. There was every chance you hadn’t seen or known of those stats before, but now you are wilfully...

There is right and wrong to the extent that you may use evidence to substantiate your claims. For example, you claim that Dunk is not good enough in the air despite being 6ft 4. Despite you saying this, Dunk had more headed clearances than Mawson, than £60 million rated Harry Maguire. This also...

You’re continuing to talk complete rubbish. You haven’t tempered any of he ridiculous things you’ve stated when given the opportunity to do so, so I can offer no leniency in regard to your absurd and quite frankly idiotic assessment that no club would pay over £18 million for Dunk. I’d suggest...

Okay, this is confirmation for me. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about, at the very best your ‘knowledge’ is fabrication from your own delusion. You and others may think I’m being overly harsh, but I cannot fathom how you can come out with this kind of drivel. The first thing...

Are you suggesting that we wouldn't get more money for Dunk than Moore would cost us?