Not all the evidence was in back then - i.e. are any other sites suitable and available? This time, it should (!) be a bit more clear cut. The delay could come from the Inspector saying 'so and so is suitable', and Prescott disagreeing because - once again - it is not in keeping with government...
Damn straight. A fine sight, and a fine site.
It doesn't take much to wind us up, does it? Light the blue touch paper, and whoosh, up we go... Are we all getting a bit jittery as the public inquiry draws near?