Search results

Really? Tricky to miss the 1980s when you're still there.

And those who haven't are the ones creating the bigger problem.

The point I'm making is he is using hyperbole based upon a factual error to underline his case. He might passionately argue his point - good for him, but in this case it highlights (and attempts to make up for) the lack of strength in his central argument. A good argument has its basis in true...

Quite. And therein lies another issue. The fella in the video posted by WildWood was saying sex and gender are one and the same, which further undermines his poor argument. We already know they're not.

That's not what I quoted. Also - the binary concept of men & women isn't absolute. Never has been.

I've just pointed out one of them as being factually wrong. And it's a material fact. If he doesn't understand the history, his right to comment - let alone comment self-authoritatively - is severely diminished.

"For all of human history - boy meant boy and girl meant girl". Wrong. He clearly has no concept of the history of the meaning of those two words. And from there, it's fairly obvious he isn't dealing with research or history or even the flawed notion of binary biology, he's dealing with his own...