Search results

I talk on a regular basis to councillors - of all parties - on a variety of issues, some of which I hear about first on here. I'll go back to them, and get their take on it. Sometimes it's something that is quite worrying; at other times it's having to correct some absolute drivel that the Argus...

Not at all. I'm dealing in facts. You're dealing in conjecture.

'Togher stance'? 'Friendly areas'? You're still talking nonsense. This administration - along with all administrations - takes the legal route regarding disruption, eviction and so on. 'Tougher stance' has no meaning in this instance.

What's that got to do with your argument? Did you think that 'voting out the Greens' will change how evicting them is achieved? The council has to operate within the law, which is exactly what it does - whoever is in charge.

Or that it's not their resonsibility. Devil's Dyke isn't within the Brighton & Hove City Council boundaries.

Quite. Studio150 is talking shite. Meanwhile, this council - every council - operates within the confines of the law. The camp at Horndean is basically a legal obligation; this administration wants them in this city no more than anyone else. Studio 150 evidently has no understanding of how this...