Search results

That wasn't a defensive account mainly because it wasn't about me, it was about you. And you are not that good at debating. I'll spell it out for you because, no matter how many times you get told this, you still go down your path of self-righteous judgement and immature reasoning. The point...

I could try but to be honest, he doesn't know how to debate. He picks and chooses second and third-hand supporting evidence to back up his theories, passes them off as fact irrespective of the fact he knows no more about this story than you or me. He then accuses you, me and others of being...

Oh, the irony.

Are you Adam El-Abd? Are you Adam El-Abd's agent? Are you Dick Knight? Are you Dean Wilkins? If the answer to any of these is 'YES', why are you coming on here lobbing stnk bombs about? If the answer to all four of those is 'NO', you don't have an intimate knowledge of what's going on. At best...

See - there you go again. You can't resist it. You don't know what's going on - YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON - no-one does - yet you still value your own 'opinion' highly enough that you feel you can make a judgement about what's going on and who is doing what. You don't know what's...

So, you admit it - you make things up as you go along. You've taken a magic leap from 'a deal is on the table' to 'that El-Abd is being treacherous' because, er, you can. Good one. However, back in the real world 'a deal is on the table and has been for quite a while' is all we actually know. If...

:thud: You're priceless, you are. Absolutely priceless. YOU were the one who said that the negotiations should be kept out of the press. I reminded you - because it seemed apparent that you need reiminding - that they have been kept out of the press. Now you're saying that because Dick Knight...

The club. They have kept negotiations out of the press. You've just filled in the gaps yourself by saying 'El-Abd is still discussing terms...' Where did that nugget come from? Are you on-message with negoations? Or are we back to 'true belief' again?

Er... they have.