Search results

Verdicts due to be announced at 11am today.

But it's not even necessarily the gate being opened that caused the problem, though it may have been a mitigating factor. Something the jury must decide. Were fans pushing? Maybe. Did that lead to an unforeseeable problem? Could the fans foresee a problem? Could the police? It's where fans...

The evidence heard during the Inquest could well lead the jury to think otherwise.

They are summoned, but with this particular Inquest, bearing in mind how long they knew it was going to take, there would have been some negotiation. http://www.manchester.gov.uk/info/626/coroners/5536/information_for_jurors/8

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquests_in_England_and_Wales It is not for the inquest to ascertain "how the deceased died" or "in what broad circumstances", but "how the deceased came by his death", a more limited question. Moreover, it is not the purpose of the inquest to determine, or appear...

This isn't a trial, it's an inquest. The jury is there to weigh up the evidence, and reach a verdict, not try an individual.

Not sure what you're saying. Are you implying there is a witch-hunt?

They get expenses. But yes, it's people who, for whatever reason, were only going to be available for the long-haul. They knew this right at the top.

It's an inquest - so a 'normal' jury. The questions they are answering are in direct correlation to the evidence they have been hearing. I've dipped in and out of the Inquest as it has been reported. Some of those questions the jury have been asked will have been answered already by those who...

After two years of the second Hilssborough Inquest, including a month of summing up, the jury of seven women and three men is finally to retire to consider its verdicts. They were given a general questionnaire, with 14 questions, to complete. The jury also has to complete individual...