Search results

:ffsparr:

Make no assumptions I have no idea who he is, but to counter an argument with 'idiot' doesn't make an argument. It makes you look stupid.

Why is it if you don't agree with people they are the idiots and you so obviously are the voice for the people? Is calling names the best you can come up with? Isn't it just a little childish?

The idea of only playing matches is 5% of the set up, you are correct in your summary :lol:

I bet you and HWT are best online buddies, both up your own arses.

See above, I edited. As for run of the mill tournaments where men and women just play the three sets, I totally agree in equality.

Andy Murray is a multi millionaire, why would he care? He makes more money off court. Edit: People DO NOT go to see Serena unless they are the privileged few that can pick and choose tickets. Us nobody's just get tickets for a court on a date stated by the club, it's done by ballot. We have no...

At Wimbledon specifically, you are not going to watch women's or men's tennis exclusively. You buy tickets on a ballot. You don't know who is playing until they mail you to say you have got tickets. Wimbledon is sold out before Christmas generally. You are taking one scenario, I shall introduce...

So you would happily work 50 hours to earn what a woman earns in 30 then.

Is it? 95%? Did you pluck that little stat out of thin air? With tournaments taking place week in and week out for most of the year, training is generally done at the office, or the court in this case.

it's not equal at all, massively in favour of women. If I worked 50 hours a week to recieve the same as a woman working 30 hours a week, in the same job, I'd be pretty pissed off.