Search results

Do you think that evidence doesn't exist if you don't want it to, or are you under the impression that people can't read?

If it was too much for you to read, just concentrate on this bit: My criticism was that you suggested that people are not interested because it's not 'permitted to be reported' when this wasn't true. It had been reported.

Okay, it looks like I'll have to explain it: Fox News is a business. It has made billions by selling fear. It does this by finding people who will say the things that will make their audience scared or outraged, pointing cameras at them and asking loaded questions. They then say things that...

No pivoting, have another go.

No it isn't. Guess again.

Insults and rudeness don't hide the fact that you haven't understood my criticism. There is no need to get cross. It's not my fault that nobody was interested in the outrage that you tried to stir up.

Amazing that you don't watch the BBC, but claim to know what it is permitted to report on. You get what you are given. Ask yourself who is giving it to you and why they are giving this and not something else.

Who would be at all surprised to know that they were reported on the BBC? Who would be surprised to know that their coverage explained the facts and what both sides were complaining about rather than choosing to make an attack on either side? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-47923753...

I only remember Kenzie. So Solid Crew were better. I liked it when Harvey signed for Lewes, because there was a chance of a headline in the local paper that could have said 'Harvey's Best!' Never happened though. Explain that Benji Shapiro.

Check here: https://www.brightonandhovealbion.com/teams/first-team/ (I know it's a cheap joke, but it's also a pointless trolling thread and NSC has enough of those).