Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. Stat Brother

    [Other Sport] Paula Radcliffe denies cheating after she is "effectively implicated"...

    A whole new spin on the situation :rolleyes: :facepalm: Is it naivety or arrogance that makes someone think that answer is acceptable?
  2. Stat Brother

    [Other Sport] Paula Radcliffe denies cheating after she is "effectively implicated"...

    What Lance did was write the blue print on 'how to get away with cheating'. What you have to, say, do, act. How you train, where you train. Explaining the wins and the loses. Deflecting the media, stop the suspicion. Obviously that manual eventually became 'how not to get away with cheating'...
  3. Stat Brother

    [Other Sport] Paula Radcliffe denies cheating after she is "effectively implicated"...

    Oh definitely I was going to make your final point, but I ran out of energy. If only I had trained harder.
  4. Stat Brother

    [Other Sport] Paula Radcliffe denies cheating after she is "effectively implicated"...

    Or perhaps because they are allowed to develop in a system exploiting a near non existent testing policy. A la East Germany through the 70's and 80's and China 10 years ago.
  5. Stat Brother

    [Other Sport] Paula Radcliffe denies cheating after she is "effectively implicated"...

    Here:- http://www.northstandchat.com/showthread.php?323037-Is-Mo-Farah-a-Drug-Cheat&highlight=Mo+Farah & obviously here as well:- http://www.northstandchat.com/showthread.php?275200-Lance-Armstrong-ends-fight-against-doping-charges-part-deux&highlight=Mo+Farah Something has just occurred to...
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here