Search results

I 100% agree with your first sentence. To explain the second (where I disagree), the bookies have no idea how well the teams are going to play, nor how the game is going to play out. It's not our fault if Wolves play better than expected and I did think they looked decent. And our bench was...

Not entirely sure I agree. Wolves are a decent side, could and probably have scored, and we simply didn't create enough to deserve more than a point. And Wolves are not Burnley or Sheff Utd, they are a much better side. I say we take the deserved and fair point against a decent side and be...

Frustrating but really not as terrible as some are making out. I think Wolves have played well.

A point each would be about right. We've finished strongly but simply haven't offered enough up front

You can understand why he's gone off on one. Their game is all about the.counter attack, and Gilmour was done for pace the first time and got away with it. Didn't see much in the second incident TBF, but he's not scoring unless he goes past WBG.

We'd have one or two goals if JP was a bit better at deciding when to take a touch and when to just put his foot through it without trying to control beforehand.