Search results

Again I have answered all this, you only have to read. And you seem to have confused a temper with my mild frustration at your inability to read and/or interpret opposing points of view. I'm sure it's not your fault, I think you must do it subconsciously. But I can only imagine how you'd...

I'll say it again - please bother to READ answers when you ask for them. I have already said twice today that I favour Yvette Cooper and given reasons. Once on this thread, once on the election one.

Firstly, who says this idea that the NHS needs protecting from the Tories is going to become an increasingly strong factor? Even if it becomes a political issue, I think we are getting to the point where the public recognises that the NHS simply cannot continue to operate as it has done...

You really are a clown. But yes, it's getting boring so let's draw a line under this.

No not really. I want you to fk off back to BrightonFans.com (or whatever that other cack site is called) where you were in the good old days, preaching to your 4 slavishly devoted followers, before you slunk back over here with your tail between your legs after a 2 year absence. :)

That's a very sweet little riposte in the absence of anything meaningful. :lolol: Look it's only something I observed - I can't say thumbsups are something I've ever referred to in the past. I'm really sorry you're hurting so badly. Maybe I'll try and spare your feelings before...

Yes, this. As I said on the GE thread, the only people who have a chance are Cooper and Umunna. I think Cooper is by far the better option, but would need to ditch the entire old guard, including her own husband who has had the misfortune of being attached to the Brown regime and has an...

It's plastic paddy's modus operandi. Post some half-baked nonsense, then write two paragraphs of sanctimonious drivel when anyone dare's to point out what a child he is. It's probably why he's regarded as a complete joke even by people on his own side. Talking about self esteem deficiency and...

Do you even know what "grandstanding" means? Seriously, I'd find your naiivity quite quaint and amusing if it didn't come with your trademark pomposity, writing off genuine contenders in your usual tiresome misplaced know-it-all manner just because they don't quite fit with your 40 year out...

OK, I apologise for being a bit rude then. I was wrongly assuming you were berating London's core vote as champagne socialists, when they are the ones who have stuck by the party. I suspect Yvette Cooper is the only real option, but that alone isn't enough. She'll need to bin some of the old...

Bless. I'm genuinely sorry that pointing out your blatant political naiivity and stupidity has caused you such offence. No personal huff here though - I've just got you marked down as a very loud simpleton. Sorry. :shrug:

So you genuinely believe that 31% of the electorate are work shy career benefit claimers? An interesting view. I can't honestly say that either party has done enough to rid the country of these people. It's an issue that has been swept under the carpet for too long. Simply cutting benefits...

Ah a clueless northerner with his head in his arse. Why not go and have a look at London's GE results to see how London voted for Ed Milliband before talking bollocks? It is not "London's champagne socialists" that Labour need to attract, it is middle England - and that includes the swathes of...

I can't help thinking you haven't got a clue what is required to make Labour electable again.

IMO, in the past 5 decades we've had about three or four competent Labour/Tory leaders combined. Why is it that leaders are rarely the best politicians in their party?