Search results

Sadly true, now that the Aussie wicky has retired. :(

Atherton saved a test match by not walking when Donald had him caught behind. It's always gone on. I guess that this is particularly bad because Smith is such a unlikable cock in the first place.

I hope you're wrong. If we lose this, it won't be because of that. It'll be because we batted like twats in the first inning.

And his hair, Max. Don't forget his stupid hair.

If that's true then that is disgraceful from Graeme Smith.

England in the mood this morning. Sidearse was convinced he had Smith caught behind, but HARPER said no, and the 3rd umpire agreed with him (no hotspot or snickometer) Very next over, and Broad snared Prince. 38/1 now...

Sadly, play is to resume in 4 minutes. :(

Sidearse steaming in. I don't like him and I don't like his HAIR.

The signing of Panesar really is underwhelming, IMO. He's a village cricketer in all aspects except his bowling, and right now that is about as threatening as Ashley Giles (at his LEAST threatening)

Utter BIFFSPACKAS!

which they didn't. Absolute wanky batflid tossers, the lot of them. :angry:

How long before a commentator describes this partnership as providing "useful runs"? Because that would be complete bollocks, seeing as SA will get 350 on this wicket and be miles ahead by the time we bat again.

It's Thursday Trigger, not Saturday. I must admit, I struggle to see him as anything but this.

Can I just say that I haven't got a clue why Anderson comes in after Sidebottom. I know it's not his job, but has Sidearse ever done anything with the bat at test level?

170 all out I reckon.

Great "catch". Too bad he landed on his elbow otherwise it would have stuck methinks.

Is Jacques Kallis the best "part time" bowler in the world? He looks strangely dangerous every time he comes on.

None of those smug "Watching SA v SA - priceless" banners this morning then? Probably because if you blinked, you actually missed watching Strauss, Trott and Pieterson bat.

The very fact that we're arguing about it tells you all you need to know about whether or not is was right to overturn the original decision.

This seems like a very mild "insult" to be getting so worked up about. It's not like Keaton is telling you he's f***ed your mum is it?