Search results

Ramirez tried exactly the same thing except he was more clumsy and didn't get to the ball first...

I knew there was some sort of new rule but I think it was that exact incident where the comms said 'he made no attempt to play the ball & denied a clear goal scoring opportunity so it is still a red card.' Confusing!

Again, not wanting to go over old ground but I respectfully disagree. How else are you meant to 'play' a ball 4 feet in the air in the game of football without 'raising a boot' which obviously had studs on. Wait for it to come down? Not the game of football if you did. We all know why it wasn't...

Both are soft reds and soft decisions - but seen them given and seen them given as reds many a time. So enough to rescind - no!

Just watched it again. It was softer than I remember but still contact and a clear pen. Few complaints from Dummett himself at first or the team mates close to it. Stopped Lansbury shooting. I'm staggered that has been rescinded. I'm sure it has to be a case of 'beyond doubt' or something like...

Genuine question for yourself and others as maybe I missed something. The Dummett one - he was last man, didn't touch the ball and his knee made clear contact with Lansbury's leg from behind?

From Friday's game....! Shocked by this purely because of the corrupt FA upholding Stephen's one for a perfectly acceptable challenge. For me, Shelvey's was very harsh and never a red, BUT he did have a kick out so still by the laws could be deemed violent conduct, however soft. Dummett's one...