Search results

All about opinions mate, but unfortunately it doesn't really matter as CH probably can't pick his first choice partnership every match - Ie there's no way BZ can start 3 games in 8 days coming up!

Yes fair play to them for those things but I feel in everyday normal play there's a huge lack of pace & prefer one of them with Wilson/Baldock off them. Yes we've done well the last few games & both players have been individually good in certain games (BZ v Hudds & TH the last 2 IMO) but as a...

Well aware of that, but as a partnership I think it's too static & would rather Wilson up there off one or the other... We've done very well the last few games but that doesn't mean you have to agree with a partnership being strong. The midfield / wingers have been terrific and that's the...

Not at the mo but it was a few games back. We need to be prepared. I think Wilson is the most effective striker we have.

Very clever and witty reply. Keeping to the NSC tradition of 'if we won nothing is wrong' and also 'I'm going to post like a smug sarcy ****' :thumbsup:

Yes but your main point was we didn't miss Wilson today but I think we did. Bobby can't start every game anyway as we all know so it begs the question: will we go for another striker in the loan window? I'd rather we did even if it meant we had to rotate more - well worth the gamble. If Murray...

Completely disagree I'm afraid. His pace against Brentford was terrific & he showed what he's about with a poach v Hudds. Bobby & Hemed is the most static forward line ever - nowhere near enough pace. We get away with it as have Knockaert & Murphy injecting the pace but Wilson is a key part of...

Groin niggle. Missed him today - Hemed & Bobby up tops doesn't work - too slow. Hughtons subs were great again today though..