Search results

Unless of course it’s Dale Stephens injuring Ramirez or the Hemed stamp where we reserve the right to have 500 pages berating the decision saying there was no intent!!! Guess we are football fans it’s what we do!!

This is the crux of the issue for me we are still debating incidents and consistency with it here so what exactly is the point Complete shambles but why do I get the feeling no matter how bad it continues to be we are stuck with it

The player is not in control of the ball both players are looking up there is no threat on goal and the player stands on his foot. Not stamped, not raked, not caught him in full flight. That’s the difference for me Are you saying if that was given against dunk you would be on here saying yep...

There has always been an amount of discretion shown in the rules by officials. If that level of contact is going to be deemed a penalty then we will be seeing 4-5 penalty’s per game for all sorts of holds, taps, treads and arm contact. Not the way I want the game to go at all and I hold my...

Fair enough !! Don’t get me wrong I think we have been hard done by with luck so far this season so stealing a victory feels like our luck balancing itself out but if I stand back and look at that decision it is very soft.

Lots of blue and white tinted specs on this thread if that was given against us we would be livid