Search results

We should have got them. They were errors and we even got an apology for one of them.

I didn't realise I was so disagreeable. Do you mean first time in this thread or first time ever?

VAR was introduced to correct refereeing errors. It worked twice in the AEK match. Why would you not want that?

What about the penalties for Mitoma and Dunk in last season's Spurs match? The ref wasn't interested in either of those.

Let's consider last season's Tottenham v Brighton match 1. Was disallowing Mitoma's goal for handball a clear and obvious error? 2. Was allowing the other goal that VAR subsequently disallowed for Mac Ali handball a clear and obvious error? 3. Was not giving a penalty to Mitoma a clear and...

What is a clear and obvious error? They are supposed to be using that criterion for penalty decisions but they are demonstrably not able to do so consistently. If there had been a competent ref and VAR in place of the two clowns last night would they have got the "correct" decisions?

PGMOL will never agree to the useless Salisbury and the equally useless Attwell not working together because it would be admitting that neither is good enough and, thus, they are not good enough squared when paired together. The only decision of this type that PGMOL has made is that the ref in...