Or further down for Arsenal who made a profit or break even for at least the last 10 years (30 million profit during the summer transfer window) and have won more than Klop but the media consider their manager shot and laughing at his "pitty patty" football prior to Guardiola arriving.
I agree and I think I would much rather watch a Guardiola team than a Mourinho team and Peps approach to football. I was just taking issue with the assumption that Mourinho had somehow spent badly whereas if he had been the second level of spending and not be second in the league there could be...
100m is not a huge difference...really? that is 1/3 of uniteds spend and that is just this year its not even including previous years. I cant believe you brushed that off as nothing.
I think he has been getting plenty of criticism and the boring element to his tactics has always been an issue. That was the main reason why Abramovic wanted him to leave the first time was because of the boring football criticism. As for the spending he is second to a team who is outspending...