Search results

Thats why I am so disgusted. It seems the club has walked into a ****storm of its own making. They know the LMA very well and they know Gus so they shouldve seen this all coming..... I think.

I think theres no doubt that they would have known the charge before and may even have most of the documents but no lawyer in the land will start preparing a defence until they have ALL the information. The fact remains that not ALL the information was available until very recently. This is all...

That is speculation. We don't know. You maybe right but the only comment about this document is what the LMA says.

Think we should just keep bouncing this every time the witchunters start blabbing.

NO that's not what I said at all. perhaps they have good reason for getting rid of Gus but to force the LMA to make the statement they did strongly suggests that either the clubs evidence is not enough, they are handling a good case very badly or Gus is living in cloud cuckooland and has...

Well if that's true then fine but that doesnt explain what happened today. If the LMA statement is correct then the club shouldnt have planned a meeting for today and certainly should not have published the statement this morning. If the club are right then the LMA have published a borderline...

Sorry am in bed and falling asleep.I cant answer the question again without specifics but if they have contravened their regulations, if they have made slanderous comments or if they are seen as contravening employment law all of those would be cause to worry. But these are all IFS. Remember I...

OK :thumbsup:

The probably difference between your case and the LMA is that the LMA conduct their business in the public eye and are therefore far more open to accusations of slander and their reputation is much more at stake. Comparing your case and this is like saying what happens in Hassocks has relevance...

There are honestly too many imponderables there. If FOR EXAMPLE, they provide video evidence of Gus quite clearly doing something that is in breach of contract, there are no mitigating circumstances and there is no provision then yes they could get away scot free and possibly appoint a manager...

And what is the time frame in the manual? I bet you its not four days, or even five.

Kev, Im sorry its not. The LMA very very rarely come out with statements like this. You will often hear them mentioned but they hardly ever make announcements.... be logical Kev, if this statement is incorrect, the club can accuse the LMA of slander. If you're right provide the evidence...

No. Cheshire cat has got it right above. If the LMA are to believed, they've contravened their own regulations and are in breach of employment law.

And when was the original hearing? I would have wanted at least a week.... at the very least, once he was back in the country.

To be brutally honest I hope you are right because the club is more important to me than Gus but unfortunately I think your are totally blinded by your dislike of Gus. Ive felt that something smellt off since Day 1 and today its started to come out. The club may have very good reasons for...

NO...... the investigation only finished four days ago which meant that WHEN Gus's team received the documentation they would have had less than four days to prepare. You would have also have to add into that time packing up, getting new flights coming back home etc. If ı was his lawyer I would...

They can sack Gus and bring in someone at any time. Thats not the issue for the club, methinks. What they are worried about is how much its going to cost them. If badly handled this could cost the club millions.

If Gus is suspended then Gus has the right to take his holiday during that time. At the same time, Im pretty sure that the club would be asking for legal trouble if they then turned round and gave Gus only a few days notice to get back from his holiday and get his rep up to speed. What really...

As someone who has a lot of respect for the LMA and being unaware of a single case where the LMA has been found at fault, if this statement is true then I am disgusted by the behaviour of my club. If there is any truth to this statement then it is becoming to look more and more like a witchhunt...