Search results

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: We the undersigned - signed or not signed? Will the fact that Moulsecoomb has been spelt incorrectly have any bearing on this too? Surely if there are factual errors in the submission, this can only go against us. RE: My point on the planning reference was only because...

Re: Re: Re: We the undersigned - signed or not signed? I agree Tom, but sure there must be some sort of criteria for these sort of things to even be considered, isn't there?

Re: We the undersigned - signed or not signed? Err ... where is the Falmer planning reference number, how will they know what to relate this to?