Search results

Lots of implication about me about my knowledge of the legal system so I’ll leave it there.

But that right there is the point. You have taken a side, rightly or wrongly, based on a piece in the media. Calling it investigative journalism is fine but a journalist is not judge and jury.

But have they though? Lots of stories about people everyday that turn out to be incorrect or incorrect (in no way am I saying that this is what’s happened here).

It’s not just this one (I’ve not seen the documentary or read the report), it’s the whole trial by media that now seems to be more prevalent. Be it form a report about a potential crime or potential culprit right though to an heavy implication from some paper against some person

I hate the trial by media circus that seems to have become the way now. By the same token the twitter comments from his supporters are just strange, so much what about ism